PEMBANGUNAN ZONA INTEGRITAS MELALUI SURVEI PERSEPSI ANTI KORUPSI (SPAK) DAN SURVEI PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PELAYANAN (SPKP) DI KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM KABUPATEN SUMEDANG
Keywords:
Integrity Zone, Anti-Corruption Perception, Service Quality Perception, General Election CommissionAbstract
The development of an Integrity Zone is a strategic component of bureaucratic reform aimed at establishing government institutions that are transparent, accountable, service-oriented, and free from corrupt practices. For the General Election Commission (KPU) of Sumedang Regency, institutional integrity and public service quality are particularly important because public trust is fundamental to credible and democratic electoral administration. This study aims to describe the development of the Integrity Zone at the KPU of Sumedang Regency by measuring users’ perceptions through the Anti-Corruption Perception Survey (SPAK) and the Service Quality Perception Survey (SPKP). The study employed a survey method with a quantitative descriptive approach. Respondents were selected using purposive sampling based on their direct experience with services provided by the KPU of Sumedang Regency. Data were collected from 76 respondents through an online questionnaire using a six-point perception scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The scores were subsequently converted into a four-point scale to determine the Anti-Corruption Perception Index (IPAK) and the Service Quality Perception Index (IPKP). The results show that the IPKP reached 3.80, equivalent to 94.95%, and was classified as Excellent (Grade A). The highest-rated service element was the conformity of service fees with established regulations, with a score of 3.87. Meanwhile, the availability of service information, clarity of service requirements, and convenience of facilities or online service systems received the lowest score of 3.75, although they remained in the Excellent category. The IPAK reached 3.85, equivalent to 96.15%, and was also classified as Excellent (Grade A). The absence of illegal charges received the highest score of 3.87, while non-discriminatory services and the absence of unofficial intermediaries received the lowest score of 3.83. The study concludes that the KPU of Sumedang Regency has demonstrated excellent performance in public service quality and corruption prevention. Nevertheless, continuous improvements are required, particularly in service information, accessibility of facilities and digital systems, equal treatment of service users, and prevention of unofficial intermediaries, to ensure the sustainable development of the Integrity Zone.References
Abdussamad, Z., Tahir, A., & Arsana, I. K. S. (2021). Analisis tingkat kepuasan masyarakat dalam pelayanan publik (Studi kasus di Gorontalo Utara). Efisiensi: Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 18 (1). [https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v18i1.37275](https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v18i1.37275)
Akhyar, A. (2023). Kualitas pelayanan publik: Suatu tinjauan mengenai kepuasan masyarakat. Jurnal PenKoMi: Kajian Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 6(2), 103–113. [https://doi.org/10.33627/pk.62.1246](https://doi.org/10.33627/pk.62.1246)
Fasa, A. W. H., & Sani, S. Y. (2020). Sistem manajemen anti-penyuapan ISO 37001:2016 dan pencegahan praktik korupsi di sektor pelayanan publik. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2), 187–208. [https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.684](https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.684)
Firmansyah, A. C., & Rosy, B. (2021). Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan publik terhadap kepuasan masyarakat: Studi pembuatan E-KTP di Kecamatan Sekaran Kabupaten Lamongan. Journal of Office Administration: Education and Practice, 1(2), 82–93. [https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v1n2.p82-93](https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v1n2.p82-93)
Gafar, T. F., Octavia, S., Zamhasari, Z., & Suryaningsih, S. (2022). Reformasi birokrasi dan pembangunan Zona Integritas menuju Wilayah Bebas Korupsi (WBK) dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani (WBBM) di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(10). [https://doi.org/10.53625/jpdsh.v1i10.3391](https://doi.org/10.53625/jpdsh.v1i10.3391)
Hendriyaldi, H., & Musnaini, M. (2021). Analisis pengaruh pelayanan publik dan e-service quality terhadap kepuasan masyarakat di lingkungan Pemerintahan Kota Jambi. Jurnal Manajemen Terapan dan Keuangan, 10(1), 87–98. [https://doi.org/10.22437/jmk.v10i01.12531](https://doi.org/10.22437/jmk.v10i01.12531)
Ifada, T., Hardjo Soewito, S., & Soesiantoro, A. (2021). Penerapan pedoman pembangunan Zona Integritas menuju WBK dan WBBM: Studi kasus di Biro Organisasi Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur. PRAJA Observer: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 203–210. [https://www.aksiologi.org/index.php/praja/article/view/138](https://www.aksiologi.org/index.php/praja/article/view/138)
Kementerian PANRB. (2014). PermenPANRB No. 52 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pembangunan Zona Integritas.
Kementerian PANRB. (2025). Surat Edaran Menteri PANRB Nomor 4 Tahun 2025 tentang Penguatan Evaluasi Zona Integritas melalui Survei Mandiri SPKP dan SPAK.
Purnawati, N. K. S., & Sujana, I. N. (2021). Kepuasan masyarakat terhadap pelayanan publik pada UPTD Pelayanan Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah Provinsi Bali. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 9(1), 146–154. [https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v9i1.28324](https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v9i1.28324)
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Republik Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
Rofi, A. E. N., Putra, F., & Sentanu, I. G. E. P. S. (2021). Creating innovation of public value through management information systems. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(3), 513–528. [https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.513-528](https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.513-528)
Rosidi, V. C., & Sakuntalawati, L. V. R. D. (2022). ULAS: Ketercapaian pelayanan publik yang efektif berbasis digital di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 9(2). [https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v9i2.76232](https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v9i2.76232)
Sabeni, H., & Setiamandani, E. D. (2020). Pengelolaan pengaduan masyarakat dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik. JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 9(1), 43–52. [https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v9i1.2214](https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v9i1.2214)
Sandra, E., & Maryati, M. (2020). Kepuasan masyarakat pada pelayanan publik di Kantor Kelurahan Kijang Kota: Suatu catatan survei. NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1). [https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v2i1.14938](https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v2i1.14938)
Sofianto, A. (2019). Inovasi manajemen pemerintahan berbasis aplikasi digital di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 3(2), 99–108. [https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.3.2.2019.99-108](https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.3.2.2019.99-108)
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wibowo, A. C., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2024). Analisis hubungan program antikorupsi pemerintah dan perilaku menyuap pada tingkat individu di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(2), 285–300. [https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i2.1256](https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i2.1256)
Wulandari, S. (2019). The role of the community in law enforcement eradication of corruption crime. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 4(2), 117–126. [https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i2.36298](https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i2.36298).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JRPA - Journal of Regional Public Administration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






